I’m going to call this one out.
Logic:
Logic is not a lack of empathy, logic is looking at a situation with reason, it is in no way the antithesis to empathy as logic is a tool that can be used to be empathetic or not.
Examples:
I have 5$ to give to Charity, one Charity pockets 90% of the money and the other works exclusively on voluntary means and give 100% to the people its intended for. If I want my money to help the most, logically I should give it to the Volunteer Charity.
I used logic to help more effectively. If Charity 1 had advertising showing a crying child designed by market experts to make people empathetic while charity 2 had just a sign with “Donations please” It is better I use logic to use my resources to help those who will actually use it effectively.
Now on the other hand if I ran Charity 1 it would make logical sense to hire people to make my advertisements as empathy-inducing as possible so that people would donate to me without using logic and checking to see how much I’m actually giving to people.
Logic is a tool, like a hammer it can be used by good people or bad people, it can be used to build a shelter for the poor or break a window.
Objectivity:
You’re right, it is still subjectivity, it is literally impossible not to have some bias even if it’s based on something as stupid as the color of a shirt. However looking at a situation and trying your best to be objective is not a bad thing, and while some people might lack the self-awareness to recognize that they will have some bias in every situation, Objectivity is trying to fight that Bias.
Objectivity can be looking at something and trying your best to understand it and the other side or from a neutral side.
This is really, really, really, important if for no other reason than knowing your enemy is one of the most effective ways of defeating them.
Let us look at a political situation, why was *Insert elected official here* elected? Well because people voted for them. Why did they vote for them? Now if you refuse to be objective and listen to the other side, you’ll just see everything you don’t like about that person and assume they voted for them because all their voters are those bad things.
If however you look at the situation objectively and from their point of view, you’ll be able to see the appeal, and perhaps it is because they’re all these bad things, OR perhaps its because they had a good reason, and while you may not agree with their solution, you will be able to offer them an alternative solution that isn’t bad so they don’t vote for the bad candidate again.
Obviously, you can’t have no bias at all and some people do wrap themselves up in an arrogant belief they’re immune to bias, but to write off everyone who tries to look at the situation objectively as just lacking self-awareness is foolish.
Common Sense:
This one Y'all actually make a good point on. I would add to it that often everyone has a different version of what common sense is, so beyond a few universal ideas most of it is, completely subjective and not really “Common Sense”